Summary:
Sovereignty, the recent Kentucky Derby winner, will not race in the Preakness Stakes, reigniting discussions about the Triple Crown’s format. Trainer Bill Mott and owner decisions have led to a notable absence of Derby champions in the Preakness, with this being the second instance in four years and the fifth in seven. This trend raises questions about the current scheduling of races, which many consider outdated, especially as elite horses now prefer longer recovery times between competitions.
Steve Asmussen, a leading trainer, acknowledges the complexity of the debate surrounding potential changes to the Triple Crown format. While the challenge of winning all three races is a significant attraction, some worry that altering schedules might dilute the series’ prestige. Historical context reveals that Triple Crown opportunities have diminished over the years, shifting from a time when running back-to-back races was common to the present, where avoiding short turnarounds is increasingly favored.
Noteworthy trainers like Baffert and Casse emphasize the importance of retaining top competitors for the sport’s excitement. Meanwhile, trainers like Mott exhibit a more cautious approach towards racing Derby winners in subsequent events. Jerry Bailey, a Hall of Fame jockey, highlights the contrast between past racing norms and contemporary practices, suggesting that ensuring the best horses participate is crucial for maintaining the Triple Crown’s allure. As the sport evolves, the discussion about the best way to structure the Triple Crown continues, emphasizing the nuanced balance between tradition and the health of the horses involved.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
